Clients choose SpencePC because we do outstanding work for fair compensation. Unlike our competitors, we encourage the use of alternative-fee agreements that more closely align our clients’ interests with the Firm’s interests. As a result, our clients pay only for the value they receive.
Our philosophy is simple: be outstanding and offer a unique value proposition. Hourly billing creates the wrong incentive for attorneys to work longer, not smarter. Instead, we encourage alternative-fee arrangements that reward success and efficiency. By doing so, our attorneys remain focused on obtaining the best results for our clients in the most cost-efficient manner.
We are attorneys who specialize in intellectual property and complex litigation. We hold science, engineering, and law degrees from the nation’s top schools. Following our education, each of us received years of additional training from prestigious, top-tier law firms. Our billing model ensures we remain focused on obtaining the best results in the most cost-efficient manner.
On March 25, 2020, SpencePC client B*EIOR received a victory in its opposition to a FRCP 12(b)(6) Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim under 35 U.S.C. 101 when the Judge denied defendant Teradata’s motion.
Plaintiff and client Tad Lepman of B*IEOR is pleased with the results and looks forward to a successful resolution going forward and praises SpencePC for its excellent service and dedication in securing this result. Mr. Lepman remarked “the team at SpencePC produced a clear and convincing argument navigating today’s legal uncertainty regarding Section 101 and Alice case law. SpencePC’s patent infringement case for B*IEOR is now strengthened with the district court’s finding of the inventiveness of our patents.”
(312) 635-2299
This website has been built to be accessible for all users. If you experience any difficulty in accessing this website, please contact us for assistance.